Inquisitions in Medieval Viticulture and Winemaking with
a Focus on Cistercian Technique.
The use of wine as a popular drink has been around for centuries.
From references in the Bible, to Roman records, and later as symbol
in Christianity it is an ever present desire of men. The importance
Christianity had when promoting viticulture and wine making influenced
the Cistercians to master the art during the Middle Ages. Their acquisition
of vineyards in Burgundy paved the way for new techniques and a higher
standard of vine growing and wine making. With the cutting edge dominance
in viticulture and oenological imperialism they were allowed to experiment
and establish a monoculture of Pinot Noir grapes. Evidence of the
higher level of quality their monoculture of Pinot Noir produced is
expressed in profitability, government and religious support, and
laws past protecting it.
It is very possible that after the fall of the Roman Empire viticulture
found new life and endurance due to the relationship between Christianity
and wine. With the establishment of the new covenant wine came to
symbolize the blood of Christ. In the Gospel of Saint Matthew, Christ
is quoted as saying, “Drink from it all of you. This is my blood
of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness
of sins. I tell you, I will not drink of this fruit of the vine, from
now until that day when I drink it anew with you in my father’s
Kingdom” (VI: 26-29). This relationship is argued to be the
main cause of the very survival of viticulture. “If an early
identification with religion promoted viticulture in the ancient world,
viticulture’s very survival depended on its religious associations
during the centuries that followed the fall of the Roman Empire”
(Unwin 134).
Throughout the centuries images of the last supper, where Christ
offers wine to the disciples, can be seen in paintings, engravings,
drawings, and almost all other forms of religious art. At the end
of the Middle Ages a new image appeared throughout Europe. In artwork
people displayed Christ in a winepress. In “Le Pressoir de Nostre
Sauvur Jesus Christ,” image
1, French winemakers are pressing
Christ and barreling the blood of the new covenant. This image supports
the close correspondence between wine, winemaking, and Christianity.
These images can be seen on many stained glass windows throughout
many wine producing areas of France and Germany. In a “Calendar
Page for January,” image 2,
circa 1353 France, it shows St. Paul, prophets, and saints with grape
vines surrounding them. One person looks to be actually climbing or
pruning the vines. This is another example of the close relationship
between Christianity and wine. “In 1336 Petrarch said that the
popes were lingering at Avignon because the cardinals were loath to
return to Rome on account of the fact that there was no ‘Beaune’
in Italy and they could not be happy without this beverage, adding
that: ‘They look upon wine as a second element and as the nectar
of the gods’” (Hatch 230).
By the 11th century vines were being cultivated throughout most of
Europe. From warm temperate areas, such as in Italy, to colder areas
of Burgundy and northern France, people established vineyards. Tim
Unwin comments, “the symbolic drinking of wine as part of the
Christian Eucharist, Mass or Communion, was to play a fundamental
role in influencing the global distribution of viticulture, and the
social and ideological significance of wine, but wine and the vine
are also found in three other main aspects of Christian symbolism”
(Unwin 139). They are the comparison with Jews as a vineyard, Christ
as a vineyard, and the use of wine in aspects of Catholic priesthood.
Between the 11th and 14th centuries Europe experienced significant
population growth. Urban centers rapidly expanded as people moved
into them. As the population grew the merchant class expanded to facilitate
the growing demand and market for luxury items in cities like London,
Paris, and Venice. The desire for wine, especially quality wine, by
the upper-class, caused an increase in vineyards and production of
wine in many rural areas. In the 10th and 11th centuries French landowners
cleared forested lands and drained marshes to create new vineyards
and facilitate this demand (see esp. Berman Ch. 2). The growth of
towns and new economy within them led to the creation of large commercially
owned vineyards. The Bordeaux region of France entered and became
a key player in wine production at the beginning of the 13th century.
The climate and topography of Bordeaux provided excellent conditions
for growing a selection of both red and white grape varietals.
The expansion of productive viticulture to parts of France, with
a focus on northern France, is discussed by Tim Unwin, he says, “Three
main images are to be found in literature concerning viticulture and
the wine trade during the medieval period. The first is the contrast
that is widely thought to have existed between the Mediterranean and
northern viticulture, with the former being seen as largely subsistence
based and the latter as being directed much more towards export trade
and commercial profit” (Unwin 166). He discusses that the second
image is that the structure and organization of trade tends to exclude
others. A good example of this, which I will discuss in depth later,
is the hindrance Rhine River wines, by Burgundian dominance, had when
trying to compete in French markets. The third, that viticulture during
the Middle Ages experienced little technical growth, is correct, with
an exception to the anomaly that existed in Burgundy.
Starting in the 8th and 9th century, Burgundy and elsewhere in France
saw an expansion of monastic orders. The Cistercian order, taking
there name from their abbey at Citeaux, was founded in 1098 by Benedictine
monks. It was founded “on the principles of separation from
society and close adherence to the original tenets of Benedictine
rule” (Constance, Brittain, Bouchard, I). Their relationship
and knowledge of God was defined though their self imposed “poverty,
manual labor, silence and obedience, and intellectual learning and
contemplation” (Constance, Brittain, Bouchard, I).
The Cistercians acquired lands in Burgundy though a number of different
enterprises. First, many of the lands were presented as gifts from
local knights, the church, and the upper class. Second, though careful
research the Cistercians purchased lands that would provide them with
an economic return. Third, there was a small amount of land that was
acquired through exchange or barter (see esp. Berman Britain Bouchard
31-95).
The transfer of land, as a gift, was very common by knights during
the time of the crusades. In fear of leaving Europe, with the possibility
of death, a knight would give lands to the church or specific monastic
orders in exchange for their prayers. Belief, by the knights, that
these prayers would aid them in their safe return or salvation in
the afterlife. The elite members of society would also give gifts
of land, whether vineyard or not, in return for the prays of the monks,
aimed either at themselves or loved ones, alive or deceased. “Over
half of the men and women involved in the transactions with the Cistercians
can be said to be from the society’s elite. This includes 8
percent from the very upper levels of that elite (i.e., kings, dukes,
counts, viscounts); 7 percent churchmen; 22 percent castellans and
powerful lords; and 26 percent knights” (Constance, Brittain,
Bouchard 165). Gifts of vines and vineyards where made to most houses
in the Cistercian order during the Middle Ages (see Berman 92).
Though research, Cistercian monks carefully purchased lands that were
suitable for vineyards or other agricultural purpose. “Nothing
in the original Cistercian legislation forbade purchases, and in certain
situations the monks found purchase a highly desirable type of transaction”
(Constance, Brittain, Bouchard 56). An advantage to this strategy
was that monks got the land they desired at the time they purchased
it and did not have to wait for a donation. It was common for vineyards
to be purchased because they require specific growing areas that are
affected by topography, soil chemistry, and the direction a hillside
might face. Purchasing the land for vineyards allowed them to choose
the best location; locations that might not have been offered as gifts.
“Since the order lacked such sources of cash as borrowing, or
pilgrim trade, and received few enormous bequests, it may be concluded
that from very early in its history the cash for land purchases was
internally-generated” (Berman 40). Money, used to purchase land
for use as new vineyards, would have been generated by the revenue
of existing vineyards.
“An increasingly common transaction after about 1150 was the
pawn, in which the monks advanced a layman a lump sum of money in
return for a piece of property” (Constance, Brittain, Bouchard
33). The owner could return the money to the monks in a lump sum or
at arranged intervals of time. It is very unlikely that monks sought
interest for this loan because it conflicted with Catholic doctrine.
Collecting interest on a loan was believed to be the same as selling
time, which was a sin. After gifts, leasing became the second most
common method of receiving lands. Cistercians would pay the owner
a specific amount of money, for a specific period time, and for a
specific piece of land. At times, Cistercians would lease land that
was not in use for agriculture to peasants for an annual fee. Monks
would also at times exchange lands that were not especially useful
for lands that were desirable.
With newly acquired lands, the Cistercians in Burgundy were able
to expand their vineyards throughout the region. They had come to
own some of the most prestigious vineyards, that to this day, are
known for some of the best wines available in the world. Their careful
research and knowledge of viticulture had helped them make exceptional
choices when choosing these locations. It was not the land alone that
guaranteed such quality, but the revolutions in the technique of growing
grapes and making wine, founded by the Cistercians and which will
be discussed later in greater detail.
By 1275, the Benedictine abbey of Cluny, had come in possession of
all the vineyards around Gevrey, located roughly 10 km south-west
of Dijon. In 1232, another abbey, Saint Vivant at Vosne, came to own
the vineyard of Romanee-Conti, La Romanee, La Tache, Richebourg, and
Romanee-Saint-Vivant. (See esp. Unwin 178) In the years between 1110
and 1336 the Cistercian abbey of Citeaux acquired lands in and around
Vougeot. They eventually owned many vineyards in the vicinity creating
the largest single vineyard in Burgundy, the Clos de Vougeot. The
vineyard, located roughly 20km south-west of Dijon, eventually had
a wall built surrounding it.
Until the 13th century white grape varieties played the dominant
role in Burgundy. Characteristically, white grapes are more resilient
to the moisture and cold weather found in Burgundy. They have a shorter
maturation period which corresponds to a shorter growing season. The
environmental issues facing wine producers in Burgundy made it much
more difficult when selecting a variety and maintaining the vines
year after year. Growers continually experimented with varieties that
were very successful in Italy but failed in Burgundy.
The Cistercians established a monoculture of the Pinot Noir grape
in Burgundy between the 13th and 14th centuries. Pinot Noir would
come to dominate the region and the Cistercian’s wine would
soon be known as one of Europe’s most prized. Pinot Noir is
not an easy grape to grow, it “demands much of both the vine-grower
and wine-maker” (Robinson 736).Only with care and maintenance,
with the hope of a good growing season, can it become a profitable
use vineyards; especially during the Middle Ages. Its inconsistency
is why many wine producers, both during the Middle Ages and today,
tend to choose an alternative grape variety.
During the Middle Ages vine cultivation and wine making was treated
like normal agriculture and food processing. The Cistercians employed
many new revolutionary techniques aimed at vine cultivation and making
wine. They researched the relationship between soil, climate, and
plant. They experimented with soil preparation, vine cultivation,
training, pruning, and grafting. They also displayed a lot of effort
to master the actual process of making wine. Through experimentation,
with failure and success, their product grew to revolutionary new
heights of quality and eventually notoriety. With the use of period
art work it is clear to see what the Cistercians were doing correctly,
what others were doing wrong, and what the normal practices of vine
cultivation were before the Cistercians.
The Cistercians used methods including training vines on trellises,
on poles, and up trees. At the abbey of Muri, they established a system
which included, “you manured; pruned; hoed over once before
Easter; tied up the shoots; hoed again before Midsummer; layered some
of the shoots; and to help the grapes to ripen you removed any leaves
that covered the clusters” (Postan 170). The hoeing allowed
water to seep in deeper and hit the root systems providing the plants
with essential nutrients. The act of tying up the shoots and layering
them is a method of training the vines to grow in the most efficient
way. If vines were allowed to grow freely they naturally would grow
up and towards the sun. By training along trellises it allows more
surface area in the vine to be in direct contact with the sun. Direct
contact encourages, spread over a larger area, rapid and increased
leaf growth leading to a better supply of energy provided for fruit
production.
Image 3 shows exactly
what sort of training the Cistercians would have used. Grapes are
trained around poles, up trees, and even through knots in trees. Foliage
is not blocking any of the grape clusters allowing them to have unimpeded
exposure to the sun. Image 4
gives another example of these techniques. In this 14th century French
tapestry depicting a harvest in Burgundy, grapes are growing on stakes
and trellises. Though the people depicted do not appear to be monks,
they could be peasants or other skilled workers working for the monks.
If not, it is a good example of how Cistercian techniques expanded
in popularity. Image 5,
in which the location in France is unspecified, again gives a good
example of how the spread of advanced training techniques occurred.
Vines are being trained up poles and then horizontally along a center
shaft.
New techniques didn’t spread everywhere in France even by the
early 15th century. In “Tres Riches du Duc de Berry,”
in the month of September, at the Chateau de Saumur, image
6, people are harvesting grapes off low lying shrub like plants.
This was a very common scene, inferior forms of viticulture where
practiced before and after the Cistercians. Growing plants in low
lying groups is inefficient and can present many problems such as
moisture damage, pest damage, and a lack of sunlight for the leaves
and later for the fruit. These problems lead to smaller harvests and
then mediocre wine. In the March image, image
7, in the same book of hours, again we can see vines that are
forced to grow on the ground. The vines have also been pruned back
to a thick trunk, about two feet high, with no appearance of new spring
time shoots. These types of growing techniques are an excellent contrast
against the Cistercian’s methods.
After harvesting the grapes the Cistercians brought experience and
know-how to the process of turning the grapes into wine. They used
a system of hierarchy in which the best hand selected grapes would
make their best wines and lesser quality grapes would be used for
common or table wine. Traditionally, making exceptional wines and
the income received allowed them to own numerous elaborate wine presses.
Screw driven presses extract all the juices from the grape, including
the juices in the skins, “while red wine could easily be made
by being trodden, it was still necessary to press the skins to extract
the remaining juice” (Unwin 172).
Many peasants and others whom could not afford a wine press did use
methods of squeezing the juices out of the grape with their feet.
At times they would pay a noble or monastery, usually in wine, for
the use of a screw press. In “Les Vendages,”
image 8, it shows a harvest in Burgundy. People, whom appear to
be peasants, are extracting the wine by both methods: by foot and
by screw press. A couple walking through the scene appears to be from
the upper class. The man is the lord and is observing the use of his
wine press.
After the juices were extracted, the Cistercians monks used experience
and patience to ferment it and turn it into wine. Their understanding
of the consumer’s palates enabled them to continually produce
superior wines. “In the years of bad weather the must from some
of the north-western European vine-yards tends to be low in sugar
and sugar is added (by law) to bring up the ultimate alcohol content
of the wine” (Younger 259). The Cistercians were masters of
the correct application of this; they got it right. Medieval wines
were sometimes unstable and honey, water, eggs, and pine-kernels were
used for taste and clarification. Though these applications were used
by many wine makers it is hardly mentioned during the wine making
process of the Cistercians. They did not require additives to correct
their Pinot Noir. See image 9 for a 13th
century monk testing wine. They also invented the notion of “CRU,”
in which they identified different areas of the vineyard with producing
different qualities and tastes of wine consistently from year to year.
There is other evidence of the superiority of Cistercian made wine.
“So reputable did the Cistercian’s wine become that the
order was granted not only land but also extensive privileges”
(Philips 96). In 1171, Pope Alexander, waived the order from paying
any church tax on their vineyards. Later he would threaten to excommunicate
anyone whom challenged the decree. “Also in 1171, King Louis
VII of France freed the Cistercians from paying any of the duties
that would normally be levied on the transportation and sale of their
produce” (Philips 96). After the end of the Middle Ages, Holt
comments, “by the fifteenth century the ultimate gift to present
to kings and princes was a barrel of this fine wine, which many believed
had no equal anywhere in Europe” (Holt 73). As monks left their
Burgundy home to form the Kloster Eberbach, in the Rhine area, they
brought vines from Burgundy to grow there. They had little success
and resorted to growing white grape varieties. The elite members of
society favored Burgundian wine so much that they barred other wines
from making it to the markets in Paris and other commercial centers,
“at the Burgundian and Languedoc frontiers vinegrowing communities,
powerfully supported by their princes, jealously barred the passage
of southern wines” (Duby 139).
In the 13th century the wines of Beaune became highly desired. This
demand, by consumers in Paris, made the two week voyage profitable.
The wines had to be moved over land until hitting the river Yonne,
and then floated to the capital. The dukes of Burgundy worked to promote
these wines whose expansion could have been greater if not for the
obstacles in correlation with the network of rivers (see esp. Duby
137-41).
Other than the revolutionary new techniques in viticulture practiced
by the Cistercians, there were other reasons that affected the monoculture
in Burgundy. First, there was an urban resurgence; towns grew larger
and the population continued to grow in Burgundy and northern France.
People started to demand luxury items to enhance their lives. Second,
these demands facilitated “the elevation of wine to a prominent
position as a symbol of social status among the burgesses of these
towns and cities” (Unwin 175). To aid in desire of wine, three
forces helped to expand vineyards. The nobility purchased the wine,
the church profited and purchased the wine, and the monasteries profited
from the sales. The sale of the Cistercian’s wine depended on
their ability to deliver high quality Pinot Noir.
As evidence, it is important to look at the implications the Black
Death had on Burgundy. The production of wine decreased as the Bubonic
Plague killed off as much as a third of Europe between 1348 and 1400.
The market and demand for wine also suffered significant loses. Due
to the effects of the plague, skilled workers became minimal, and
the maintenance of vineyards in Burgundy fell short of what was required
to maintain them. This resulted in eroded and overgrown vineyards.
At this point use of the Gamay grape becomes more popular. Though
grown in small amounts, among the well established monoculture of
Pinot Noir, it now makes an even bigger appearance in Burgundy. The
Gamay grape, most commonly known today as Beaujolais, had many advantages
over Pinot Noir. “Gamay vines were easier to cultivate than
the notoriously sensitive Pinot Noir; the Gamay grapes ripened more
quickly, so that they were at risk from frost or other climatic adversity
for a shorter time; and they had a much higher yield- Gamay yield
was between two and four times that of Pinot Noir vines in the fourteenth
century” (Philips 98).
“The introduction of Gamay to the vineyards of the COTE D’OR
in the late 14th century was viewed as scandalous by those whose livelihood
did not personally depend on rearing productive vines, and great efforts
were made to retain Pinot Noir at the expense of the less noble newcomer”
(Robinson 421). People, especially the aristocracy, were used to the
quality and stature that a monoculture of Pinot Noir provided. The
invasion of the Gamay grape caused action by some to protect this
monoculture.
Philip the Bold, Duke of Burgundy, and the first of the Valois Dynasty
which ruled from 1363 through 1477, opposed the introduction of the
Gamay grape. His marriage, seen in image 10,
was to Margaret, granddaughter of the countess Margaret of Flanders,
with whom Philip signed a treaty with and essentially inherited the
duchy from (see esp. Vaughan 154). “On 31 July 1395, he declared
war on a very different sort of enemy, the Gamay grape, ‘a very
bad and very disloyal plant,’ he declared, which ‘is very
harmful to human beings’” (Berlow 426). His argument was
that buyers whom came to Burgundy in search for the incredible quality
that the area had become known for due to the Cistercians were no
longer coming. The Gamay grape was producing substandard wine and
merchants were adding water to the wine to overcome the bitterness
that the variety was known for. He ordered that all vines be cut down
within a month and uprooted by the following Easter. Failure to abide
by this decree would have landed any person in jail; as such was the
case with the mayor of Dijon whom opposed the decree on the bases
that it violated winegrowers’ liberties (see esp. Berlow 427).
Though most of his blame, for the decline in sales and quality of
wine, lied on the Gamay plant it is important to stress other factors
which contributed to that decline. As mentioned earlier, the Black
Death, was the largest contributor. People grew Gamay because it was
easier. The common vine grower might have not employed the techniques
and skill as the Cistercians did while growing Pinot Noir. The Cistercians
integrated Gamay for the same reason; it was less labor intensive
in an environment where workers were at a minimal.
“Despite the extension of the use of Gamay, overall wine production
on the estates of the duke in the area of Beaune declined in the years
between 1371 and 1394 to only three-fourths of its mid-century level.
Administrative and managerial changes can explain this decline to
some extent, but the catastrophes which had intervened were probably
more significant. Plague returned to Burgundy around 1360 with results
even more traumatic
than in 1348” (Berlow 431).
It is important to note that consumers desired the quality of Pinot
Noir wine set forth by the Cistercians. They didn’t desire Gamay,
but unfortunately, the plague and its effects, and the ease of growing
it by unskilled growers, disrupted the monoculture that was possible
because of Cistercian technique. Philip the Bold was wise to see that
the strengths of Burgundy’s wine trade, laid in maintaining
the traditional monoculture.
With early connections in Christianity to the overall desire for
wine as a luxury item, wine during the Middle Ages grew immensely
in popularity. The Cistercians’ ideals allowed them to revolutionize
how people grew vines and made wine. Their ideas spread all over Burgundy
and Western Europe. The quality of wine they produced under a monoculture
of Pinot Noir gained respect and was highly desired. Evidence of this
notoriety can be seen in the momentum they expanded vineyards, privileges
allowed to them, and laws past to protect the monoculture they established.
Works Cited
TOP